Wobbly Parker

The high profile online eyewear entity Warby Parker has decided to test the brick-and-mortar scenario of dispensing with a flagship shop in Soho, NYC. So 20/20 decided to do some testing of our own with an unidentified secret shopping excursion. This blog entry was positioned as an ongoing editorial column encompassing two consecutive monthly issues of 20/20. The quest was indeed… wobbly at best.—James J. Spina, 20/20 Editor in Chief

Eye Love Shopping (Part One?)

Hello and… Good Buy. I’m product addicted, and even though I’m aware there’s a spot reserved for me and other oversatiated consumers in Dante’s inferno, nothing’s ever going to stop my pursuit of material goods. So with the opening of an actual Warby Parker optical shop in Soho within sight of 20/20, it was a destined venture.

If you’re going to start complaining about WP and their e-commerce, and online PDs and cheap product, and their marketing and PR… STOP right there. Eyewear is currently at a super high-profile level and more-than-some of it has to do with WP, and THAT’s a good thing for everyone in optical right now. Consider it a blessing your retailing doesn’t involve PCs or cupcakes (with both those markets tanking and mobile devices and doughnuts surging).

Strongly committed to the dispensing process that partners an eye exam to the acquisition of well-fitted glasses, I’d hesitated doing online “secret shopping” for frames but the opportunity of an actual store pushed my button.

Subsequent parts of this story will be further animated about the actual store (with its library setting, great music and consumer-friendly product displays) but the main issue here and now is the opportunity of an eye exam by an OD. When I initiated my interest in a purchase, the WP sales associate (NOT an optician) asked for my Rx. I declined. She then offered to actually call my doctor for it. I noted THAT was equally creepy and asked for an exam. Initially told the wait could be very long, I was put face-to-face with a receptionist who gave me a specifically timed appointment two days away with a qualified OD at a cost of $50.

I gave my name and e-mail address asking if I should pick out eyewear in advance of the exam.

Nope. That whole “pick ’n’ choose” process could follow the exam but I was invited to stay and browse, trying on any of the hundreds of frames (from a surprisingly limited number of styles) on the wall displays. The displays also held books, some for sale and some a bit too preciously color-coded, reinforcing the lounging theme. Prices were clearly marked at $95 for a completed single-vision frame with lenses.

So now I’m asking you to lounge with this 20/20 for the next month. I’ve had my exam. I’ve picked out my frame. Delivery is expected in two weeks. Full reports next month. Be assured, we’ll chat more about your new brick-and-mortal competition… next month.

Hopefully we are ALL in this with open minds, much to learn and cooperative teamwork as everyone takes time figuring out how to keep eyewear as a respected “need” and “want” product and experience.

—JJS

Wobbly Parker

Last month’s column was devoted to the beginning of my experience purchasing eyewear from the new Warby Parker store in Soho just a few blocks from the 20/20 edit office. I also had an eye exam at the store, turning down their offer to fulfill a provided Rx from my own OD. The thorough and careful exam was $50 as detailed by a Dr. Esther Kim at the terrific exam room in the store. At that time I was also presented with my personal Rx for use anywhere I’d like in or beyond the WP store.

So far so good. I picked out frames with the help of an attentive sales associate, and my PD was taken by an eyecare professional who informed me my eyewear would be ready for pickup at the Warby Parker distribution center in the Puck Building a few blocks from the store in eight to 10 days, and that I would be notified by e-mail when the eyewear was ready for an in-person fitting. I called twice after the allotted time and was informed that because this was a progressive diagnosis, it was taking slightly longer. I already knew that the cost would be $225 as compared to the widely signaged price of $95 in the store. The lower price was explained as being for single-vision glasses.

It is now over a month since this experience started, and I just made the call to cancel noting that it was taking far too long. Very pleasantly I was told the order would be cancelled, and there would be a refund on the charge.

Somewhere down the road and in some other part of 20/20, the Warby Parker story will certainly continue but space on this experience in my editor’s column is at an end. From my experience it would seem that WP’s attempt at brick-and-mortar has become brick and mortally wounded. It’s looking like they might be custom-made for online ordering by younger single-vision hipsters but when it comes to (potential candidate for) hip-replacement baby boomers, the story radically changes. The customer service treatment when I did actually cancel was superb, although I’ll feel even better when the refund is noted on my credit card account.

I sure hope they haven’t written me off as over-the-hill and not worth stepping up to the challenge. I looked forward to asking some key questions about my new lenses. I was equally curious about the actual frame fitting and adjustments that might take place. But with a turnaround of over a month, nothing at this point can compensate for the breakdown of THIS particular experience.I want the world and I want it now. AND… I want to see that world perfectly in frames that fit my face with a custom-made look and feel. And since I’m devoted to the art of communicating and engagement, I await comments and feedback from the readers of 20/20 AND Warby Parker.

—JJS

A Refraction Patients Can Trust

Andrew KarpBetter or worse? These words are familiar to anyone who’s ever had a refraction or given a refraction. Yet having my vision tested fills me with anxiety. Perhaps because it is a test that I can’t study for and in fact, often fail.

I get a sinking feeling in my stomach as I read down through the Snellen chart, and each successive line gets more blurry. Is that an “n” or an “m”? An “o” or a “2”? At some point, I find myself guessing.

As I peer at the chart, I usually get too close to the photopter and fog up the lens with my breath. “Sorry,” I tell my doc. “That’s OK,” he reassures me while wiping the lens clean. “That happens to everyone.” Somehow I doubt it.

But getting back to the question of better or worse. Sometimes I just can’t decide between A or B. They seem about the same. Yet one is supposed to let me see more clearly, isn’t it? The fact that I often can’t see the difference makes me doubt myself. It also makes me distrust the test. What if A is really better than B, but I chose B? Now I’ll have a prescription based on that choice, and lenses that I’ll have to live with for a while. And that makes me anxious too.

When it’s all over, my doctor hands me my prescription, and I can see in black and white what I already knew: My vision is a little worse than it was a year ago. It’s not good news, but I have to accept it.

I suspect many people have similar feelings about getting their vision tested, but few discuss those feelings with their doctor, either out of politeness or because they believe it won’t matter. And I suspect that for some ODs, refractions have become so routinized that they aren’t thinking about how their patient might feel.

Maybe it’s time for optical professionals to find a way to make the refraction a better experience for the patient, one that the patient can feel good about and ultimately believe in.

— Andrew Karp, Group Editor, Lenses and Technology

In Plain Sight

What follows is one optical pro’s take on what it takes to deal with the ongoing issue of thievery in a retail environment. Some might consider this particular action as rather drastic and potentially dangerous. Check it out and tell 20/20 how you feel and how you might act in coping with the affront of someone stealing YOUR wares.  — James J. Spina, 20/20 Editor in Chief

10:30 a.m. A guy comes in to look at frames.

11 a.m. I personally work with him. He knows what to ask and he is good, but I identify him as a person of interest… that is… a potential thief. I alert my staff.

7 p.m. I leave for the evening.

7:10 p.m. The same guy returns, likely watching all day to see when I leave and manages to rip us off for $9,000 at retail. My store manager runs out to chase him and actually gets a plate number.

7:45 p.m. Pittsburgh Police show up, take the report and run the plate. The vehicle is an Avis rental.

NEXT DAY: 8:45 a.m. I am on the case. If you know me, you know I’m relentless in terms of my responsibility to my profession. I call the Pittsburgh police station. My detective can’t get back to me until 4 p.m., and nobody else can talk to me about this. We have knowledge of what’s going on so we take matters into our own hands.

9:30 a.m. I reach out to the district manager of Avis; I tell her my name, the case number, the description of the car and that it was potentially involved in a string of crimes in Pittsburgh. She rallies to the righteous challenge and gives me everything she had on this rental.

9:45 a.m. I’m on the phone with the police in Copley, Ohio after finding out that car was being returned by 2 p.m. the next day. Copley police are amazing. They put an APB out on this rental.

12 p.m. I get a call. The cops have located the car. They have an unmarked watching it.

2:30 p.m. My cell rings. They got the guy. My frames are in a bag in the rental located at his condo in Ohio. He was going to sell them that afternoon.

3:30 p.m. The thief is in jail for the night, to be arraigned in the morning. We retrieve my frames along with two frames that were stolen from Heidi Optics. (Heidi owes me a beer or three for this one.)

We can breathe a bit easier, knowing we did what we had to do to protect our eyewear and put a thief in jail. I don’t want to hear my life is worth more than $9,000. Don’t steal from me. The thief is being brought up on federal charges and will face a grand jury, and YES, I will be there when he is formally charged and sentenced. I will say to him what I need to say and love every minute of it.

Brad Childs
Vice President and COO
Eyetique, Pittsburgh

What’s that Piece of Junk on Your Face?

James Spina It’s been awhile now and I’m still seething.

Allow qualifications before a rant. I don’t design frames. I don’t manufacture them. I don’t sell them. But … I DO write about eyewear and have a hand in portraying said frames to professionals who DO design, manufacture and sell (dispense) them. So, in humble scribe capacity it annoyed the hell out of me that a “reporter” (Lesley Stahl) on the nationally broadcasted TV show “60 Minutes” tersely noted “all eyeglasses are the same, still made of a couple pieces of plastic or wire, some screws and glass.”

I’m supposing by “glass” she was describing the lenses and I’d guess that “wire” description might have something to do with the metal composition of certain frames with the hinge design fluffed over as “some screws.” As for the plastic designation: Yes, zyl is plastic via its cellulose nitrate origins. That said, I’d like to stick a pair of said basic glasses as described (dismissed) on her misinformed face.

How does that feel missy? Are you ready for your audition to replace the late, never-great and ever-irritating Andy Rooney as the show’s resident curmudgeon?

What? Your nose hurts? Your ears feel irritated? Those lenses are too heavy for you? You’d like a bit of color and something more in line with the designer shoes you wear? The screw won’t… screw? Perhaps a bandage might relieve some of the pressure on the bridge of your nose. The lens just fell out? Maybe you could stick it back in with some super glue.

Excuse me, but did you just say that you can’t see? You want a prescription?! I wouldn’t advise that for that piece of junk you’ve described. It’s becoming increasingly obvious to me that you never even took a scant look at the VAST diversity of eyewear choices in a giant spread of pricing options out there from good value through to luxury eyewear. Why don’t you take a look at ANY main photo feature in any issue where 20/20 editorially highlights eyewear from over 40 different eyewear companies? And then take a look at each month’s new products section detailing eyewear from well over 50 eyewear frame resources.

I did observe you trying to glom two pairs for free from the company you were attempting to skewer. Have you ever thought about getting a nice pair of eyewear or sunglasses? Too expensive?  Maybe you should sell off some of your shoes.

― James J. Spina, 20/20 Editor-in-Chief

OOO What a Fight

James SpinaI know you know the one about the 800-pound gorilla in the room… but… did you notice that hairy beast is wearing glasses… bought… on… line?

You’ve been down this threat-strewn road before. One time the weight tip was even in the title a la 1-800-CONTACTS. And then there was the whole miracle of LASIK. Fashion and style saved more than a few butts in the CL situation since eyewear has become quite the hot BRAND accessory for women and… men? Well, men basically hate touching their eyeballs. As for LASIK, even though there’s not much in the way of bloody eyeballs when it comes to a laser procedure, there is still the misconception that there COULD be blood and, let’s face facts that down the road glasses are STILL on the agenda.

But… ordering eyewear online and securing Rx lenses with those frames via sneakily secured PDs: THAT’s a giant threat. That gorilla is breathing right down your back (and my back), and that breath is a salivating reality that ain’t going away.

What are you doing about it? Are you discussing it online or in face-to-face forums with your colleagues? Are you turning away consumers coming in asking for their PDs? Are you just confident you can survive the perceived menace in the same way you sidestepped managed care by resorting to dispensing luxury eyewear exclusively? Are you mad? Angry? Is that wrath directed at your patients? Consumers? The press? The news? Any media that gives any online eyewear entrepreneur exposure?

I don’t want to be discouraging but even though I have some of those same reactions,  most of it is wasted energy. And no matter what your role here is as you read this (dispenser, retailer, frame vendor, lens vendor, lens manufacturer, frame manufacturer, O, O, O, 20/20 editor or publisher, educator, optical organizationator, etc.!) you need a plan, and the time is ripe to act on that plan… NOW.

What am I doing? Right now I’m just exercising my role as a messenger. I need to take action as well. Some of those actions might surprise you and, hopefully, some will assist you.

Altering the scenario Dylan voiced years ago—There’s something going on Mr. O and you DO know what it is. Best I can tell you is to turn that threat into an advantage. It might mean dating that gorilla. It might mean slapping that ape right in the face, knocking off THOSE specs. But be warned: DO something.

― James J. Spina, 20/20 Editor-in-Chief

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,724 other followers